In This Issue
For those visiting fast-food establishments at least three times a week, they consumed more calories and saturated fat than occasional patrons. And, surprise, surprise, those regular patrons (three times a week or more) were fatter than the not so regular customers.
And don't forget that regular restaurants are nearly as bad, if not worse, with their monster portions, fatty sauces, and . . . Eating out in general contributes mightily to the continual fattening of America.
The December 2001 issue of the Nutrition Action Health Letter contains an interesting article on eating out, and how you can do it without adding to the statistics that are all too familiar, and support the fattening of America; and some information you can use when eating out to help you stay lean (or if you aren't lean already, to help preserve your current state).
As you know the figures are pretty staggering, and they are only getting worse. Those who are overweight has skyrocketed from 45 to 56%, and obesity is even worse, it has increased from 12 to 20%, and these changes are just since 1991.
Were these trends to continue, we will face an enormous cost in terms of disease and health care, says Centers for Disease Control (CDC) director Jeffrey P. Koplan.
For example, diabetes rates have gone from 9,000,000 in 1991 to an estimated 15,000,000 today. The significance is that obesity raises the risk of getting diabetes (it is estimated that 15 million adults now have this disease) by tenfold in men and, startlingly, 20-fold in women. Unfortunately it isn't just adults that are getting fatter. So are children and adolescents - obesity among this population group has doubled in the last 20 years - too much junk food and not enough physical activity. Kelly Brownell, an obesity researcher at Yale University says the term adult-onset diabetes is falling into disuse because children (including teenagers) are now being diagnosed with the disease.
So, what is happening to make fatness a near epidemic? Activity levels are declining, but that's been true for most of the twentieth century and beyond as the work force has shifted from physical labor to much less physically intensive labor, such as office jobs. So why has the fat explosion occurred in the last 20 years or so? David Cutler, an economist at Harvard University, thinks it's partly the fact that more and cheaper food is being produced. U.S. families in 1950 spent 21% of their disposable income on food, but in 2000 it was 11%.
This extra food at a lower price isn't just to benefit mom when she buys groceries for family meals - now, mom often works outside the home, dad works, the kids get home late from school activities, so everyone charges off to a restaurant, where serving sizes and calories are proliferating wildly. [As an example, a couple of years ago I experienced the growing portion size phenomena. At a fairly ordinary restaurant (somewhere between McDonald's and Ché Louis or . . .), when it came time to order I chose a pasta dish. The waiter asked if I'd like "small" or "large." "What's the difference", says I? With a sly grin, he said "large" is obscenely large, and "small" is large. I opted for "small," which as it turned out could have adequately fed three hungry adults (or one teenager). I shudder to think what "large" looked like. And restaurants are about as common as gas stations were a few years ago.] Not only is food cheaper and served in large portions, but it is also ubiquitous. You can get a snack or a full meal almost anywhere. Go to a book store and get a drink and/or a snack, McDonald's supplies lunches at some schools, you can eat at gas stations, shopping malls, drug stores, department stores, and. . . And what about the nutritional quality? Junk food, by-and-large.
And we don't eat to survive anymore, it has become practically a social event - it is an emotionally charged event.
Okay, so food is abundantly available in the U.S., relatively cheap and convenient, has a positive emotional impact (it's very often a social activity). This all leads to a calorie explosion, and combined with lower activity leads to the fat explosion.
What can we do to fight back? There are of course people who have figured this out; after all, there are still some lean people around, and we can't blame it all on genetics. CDC epidemiologist Ali Mokdad says that prevention could be as simple as exercising, or just getting more active. At any rate, here are some strategies for fighting back:
If you happen to be concerned about weight control, it would be best if you stick to water, seltzer, or other low-calorie beverages for accompanying your meals.
| Item | Calories |
| McDonald's Grilled Chicken Caesar Salad McSalad Shaker with a fat-free dressing | 130 |
| Taco Bell Chicken or Steak Soft Taco | 190 |
| Wendy's Grilled Chicken Sandwich | 300 |
| McDonald's Big Mac | 570 |
| Burger King Whopper with cheese | 780 |
| Burger King Double Whopper with cheese | 1,020 |
| Item | Calories |
| Crispy or soft chicken taco with beans & rice | 820 |
| Chicken fajitas with flour tortillas | 840 |
| Taco salad with sour cream & guacamole | 1,100 |
| Beef chimichanga with, rice, beans, sour cream & guacamole | 1,610 |
| And those tortilla chips you might like (50) are an extra: | 640 |
Mall Snacks
| Item | Calories |
| Häagen-Dazs Sorbet (1 scoop) | 120 |
| Häagen Dazs vanilla ice cream (1 scoop) | 270 |
| Bagel with cream cheese | 510 |
Starbucks ("grande")
| Item | Calories |
| Cappucchino with skim milk | 110 |
| Caffe Latte with skim milk | 160 |
| Caramel Macchiato with skim milk | 190 |
| Caffe Mocha with skim milk | 240 |
| White Chocolate Mocha with skim milk | 240 |
| Coffee Frappuchino, venti | 300 |
| Caffe Mocha with whole milk, venti | 430 |
| White Chocolate Mocha with whole milk, venti | 500 |
Beverages
| Item | Calories |
| Coffee, with one liquid creamer (8 0z) | 30 |
| Beer light/regular (12 0z) | 100/150 |
| Apple or orange juice (8 oz) | 110 |
| Martini (2.5 oz) | 160 |
| White wine (8 oz) | 160 |
| Red wine (8 oz) | 170 |
| 7-Up, Coca-Cola, or root beer (20 oz) | 250 |
| Draft beer, regular (22 oz) | 280 |
| Margarita (from mix), on the rocks (8 oz) | 290 |
| Burger King vanilla shake, large (32 oz) | 630 |
| McDonald's chocolate shake, large (32 oz) | 1,030 |
Sweets
| Item | Calories |
| Mrs. Field's Milk Chocolate Chip Cookie | 250 |
| Mrs. Field's Double Fudge Brownie | 420 |
| Starbucks Cinnamon Scone | 530 |
| Apple Pie | 540 |
| Baklava | 550 |
| Dunkin' Donuts Chocolate Muffin | 590 |
| Cinnabon Cinnabon | 670 |
| Fudge brownie sundae | 1,130 |
| The Cheesecake Factory Carrot Cake (1 slice) | 1,560 |
Movie Theater Popcorn (no Butter)
| Item | Calories |
| Kid's | 300 |
| Small | 400 |
| Medium | 900 |
| Large | 1,160 |
Movie Theater Popcorn (with Butter)
| Item | Calories |
| Kid's | 470 |
| Small | 630 |
| Medium | 1,220 |
| Large | 1,640 |
Slo-Mo (aka SuperSlow) weight training has become somewhat fashionable in exercise facilities. The rationale seems to be that very slow movements eliminate momentum, thus making an exercise more effective. On closer examination, this may not be true. Momentum really comes from a source other than excessive speed: poor form (technique) during a lift.
Think about it! If you are doing a Military press could you push the weight up so fast that momentum would build up to the point where you could let go of the bar and it would continue on its upward path? I don't think so. Not unless you were using a relatively light weight. Or how about arm curls? If you've ever been in a facility with free weights (machine users are just as guilty of faulty technique) you will have seen a guy (its always a guy) begin a rep by leaning forward and "cocking" his elbows, then quickly hyperextending his back while flinging the bar up toward his chest. On the downward movement to the initial position, he will lean forward while essentially dropping the bar without resistance.
A lifter can eliminate/minimize momentum by using the Slo-Mo technique, if he/she is using a relatively light weight, but only proper form will correct it with maximal or near maximal loads.
In addition to the SuperSlow technique not having any intrinsic superiority over the same exercise done faster but with proper form, there are other possible risks associated with the technique:
You may know about the four tastes that have always been identified as the only tastes that us humans recognize, but there is another one: "unami." The fact that it is difficult to describe may be the reason it is unknown to most of us. The addition of MSG (monosodium glutimate) to foods produces this taste. Its addition to foods in Chinese restaurants is well-known; although it may be known more for its high salt content, even though it is actually added for taste enhancement.
The unami taste is caused by the amino acid glutamine (sometimes glutamate) when in its free state.
Many people are unable to detect this taste, even though it was first known in Japan nearly 100 years ago. It was finally recognized more broadly by scientists in the West once specific receptors that detect the taste were found.
Magnesium is an important nutrient that has taken a back seat to more well-known nutrients such as vitamin C or calcium, but it is important - involved in energy production, heat functioning, nerves and muscles, bone health, blood clotting, and more. For the heart, magnesium helps the heart muscle and nerves that control the heartbeat. It may help prevent arrhythmias, helps control blood pressure, and may help prevent angina by maintaining healthy blood vessels.
Population studies suggest that those with a diet rich in magnesium have a lower risk for heart disease and stoke.
Magnesium is crucial to insulin use and carbohydrate metabolism. As such, a magnesium-rich diet may help prevent diabetes.
In concert with calcium and vitamin D, magnesium is important to development and maintenance of strong bones and teeth.
Foods rich in magnesium include whole grains, beans, nuts and seeds, fish, leafy greens, and avocados.
For anyone not eating a balanced diet, a multi-vitamin/mineral supplement is a good choice.
Exercise Corner features squats in this issue. There are two basic styles relative to foot plant - narrow and wide.
The major muscles used for this exercise are the quadriceps group (four muscles on the front and sides of the thigh: the vastus lateralis, vastus intermedius, vastus medialis, and rectus femoris; the gluteus maximus (the muscles you sit on), and the hamstrings (back of the thigh: the semitendonosis, semi-membranosis, and biceps femoris). Additionally, the erector spinae muscles in the lower back are statically contracted to stabilize the spine. And, the wide stance puts a major emphasis on the thigh adductor muscles (inner thighs).
Execution of the narrow stance squat begins in a standing position with your feet at about shoulder width and with your toes pointed forward. Hold a barbell across your shoulders (upper trapezius muscles). You should grip the bar just outside of shoulder width - actually wherever is comfortable. And most recreational lifters would be wise to use a specially designed pad for shoulder comfort during this exercise. Now squat slowly - you should feel like you are sitting back into a chair until you reach a position where your thighs are approximately parallel to the floor. Some lifters will stop short of parallel (typically beginners, or those using too much weight), while others will go below parallel; but keep your knees from projecting beyond your toes, and keep eyes focused in front of you - you may look up by rotating your eyes, but don't bend your neck (that old keep-your-neck-in-line-with-your-spine thing). Also keep your heels on the floor. Some people elevate their heels (often on a weight plate), but that is not recommended. You shouldn't bend forward more than 45°, and raised heels encourage an exaggerated forward bend. Be sure to maintain the normal inward arch of your lower spine. Once you reach the bottom of your squat, quickly reverse direction to the original position.
Proper breathing during a squat involves a partial valsalva maneuver (holding your breath) - inhale and hold your breath before you lower yourself into a squat. Continue holding your breath to the bottom and into the reversal of direction, which is done quickly and forcefully. Start exhaling after passing the sticking point, and forcefully complete the exhalation as you reach the full standing position. On a very heavy lift, you may make small exhalations until complete exhalation at the top. The point of holding your breath is to maintain intra-abdominal pressure to allow you to complete the lift with your spine held in place.
I personally use a Smith rack for doing squats. It allows me to precisely maintain proper form. Free squats have the advantage of requiring some additional muscle activity to maintain balance and improve it, but they make poor form more common.
(Q) I've been trying to shop healthier for my family, but am having some difficulty with whole grains. As I look at the products on the shelves at the grocery store, I see: "Wheat Berry Bread," "Hearty Wheat Crackers," "Multi-Grain Cereal Bars," "Eggo Whole Wheat Crackers," "Hearty Wheat Crackers," "Stone Ground Wheat Crackers," "Raisin Bran," " Whole Grain Glazed Donuts," Nutri-Grain Twists," "12-Grain Muffin," "Multi-Grain Cereal bars," Nutri-Grain Twists," and on-and-on.
Are these products as healthy as they sound?
A.M., Oswego, OR
(A) You can make better choices, although the manufacturers are trying their best to convince you otherwise. You have to read the nutrition labels (yes, it is tedious) to understand what you're buying. There are two keys to look for: 1) 100% whole grain, or 2) a whole grain should be number one on the Ingredients List.
If one of those two conditions is not met, I suggest you look for an alternative. Despite the fanciful, healthy-sounding names manufacturers use to try to induce you to buy their products, they may be a legal form of fraud.
(Q) When I browse book stores for books on nutrition, I am somewhat overwhelmed by the wide array of choices. Can you suggest some good ones?
B.R., Tulsa, OK
(A) Yes, here are several extracted from a list recommended in the Special Supplement to the July 2002 Tufts University Health & Nutrition Letter